Skip to main content
· 9/21/2016

Danny Powell v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an error is harmless if the court can “find that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error”
  • noting a non-constitutional evidentiary error is harmless if the “judgment was not substantially swayed by the error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.