Skip to main content
· 4/26/2007

Danner v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.

Citations

  • 255 S.W.3d 863
  • 369 Ark. 435
  • 2007 Ark. LEXIS 273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 9 U.S.C. § 12 does not come into play unless there is a written agreement to arbitrate
  • holding that 9 U.S.C. § 12 does not come into play unless there is a written agreement to arbitrate
  • a federal circuit court's decision is not binding authority on this court
  • The “time limits provided by section 12 ... do not prevent a party who did not participate in an arbitration proceeding from challenging the validity of the award at the time of its enforcement on the basis that no written agreement to arbitrate existed between the parties”
  • The \time limits provided by section 12 . . . do not prevent a party who did not participate in an arbitration proceeding from challenging the validity of the award at the time of its enforcement on the basis that no written agreement to arbitrate existed between the parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim Hannah

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.