Skip to main content
· 4/11/1984

Danner v. Hertz Corp.

Citations

  • 584 F. Supp. 293
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “At oral argument, plaintiff conceded that defendant’s vehicle was exempt from defendant’s registration requirements Such concession is required by the interaction of Delaware and New York’s reciprocity statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray M. Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.