Skip to main content
· 2/19/1998

Danner v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 963 S.W.2d 632
  • 1998 Ky. LEXIS 19
  • 1998 WL 79159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to 4 allow the victim to testify via closed circuit television because face-to-face arrangement would inhibit her testimony and cloud the jury's search for truth
  • holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to 4 allow the victim to testify via closed circuit television because face-to-face arrangement would inhibit her testimony and cloud the jury's search for truth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.