Dannebrog Rederi AS v. M/Y TRUE DREAM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in a challenge to an attachment, the plaintiff must show reasonable grounds for issuing the attachments based on the facts known at the time of attachment (citation omitted)
• distinguishing “Heidmar and Madredeus, where the issue of conversion of a Rule C to a Rule B claim was addressed simultaneous or very close to the motions to vacate and prior to appeal”
• finding proposed conversion prejudicial because “significant events occurred during the five month period between the issuance of the order vacating the Rule C arrest of the [vessel] and [plaintiffs]’ filing of their motion to amend the complaint to add Rule B allegations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).