Danko Arlington, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court plainly erred by instruct- ing the jury that it must return a unanimous nonguilty ver- dict
• observing that “we assume that the jurors follow the court’s instructions, unless there is an overwhelming probability that they are unable to do so” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• concluding this type of error is harmless in light of unan- imous guilty verdicts
• holding same, with respect to same jury instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).