Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/8/2019
Danison v. Blinco
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2767
Syllabus
By failing to file timely objections under Civ.R. 65.1(G) to the trial court's adoption of the magistrate's decision granting petitioner-appellee's petition for a civil stalking protection order, respondent-appellant failed to preserve his arguments for appeal.
Judges: Preston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Post v. LeopardiOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-11· cited 15×
- Florenz v. OmalleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-18· cited 15×
- Casto v. LehrOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-17· cited 9×
- Curry v. BettisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-09· cited 8×
- M.K. v. A.C.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-05· cited 7×
- Alomari v. AlmajaliOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-08· cited 5×
- H.W. v. M.L.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-26· cited 3×
- Steele v. SteeleOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-22· cited 2×
- Cobia v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-19· cited 2×
- Fuss v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-07· cited 2×
- Gambrel v. SegalOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-27· cited 2×
- Elijah v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-19· cited 1×
- Boggs v. CalawayOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-23· cited 1×
- A.A. v. S.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-28· cited 1×
- DeJanovic v. KashatOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-31· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.