· 4/17/2006
Danisco A/S v. Novozymes A/S
Citations
- 427 F. Supp. 2d 443
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20367
- 2006 WL 1004475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- patentee’s statements to the PTO regarding the scope of the prior art do not constitute fraud so as to waive communications with its attorneys
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.