Sixth Circuit· 1/24/2005

Daniels v. Woodside

Citations

396 F.3d 730
2005 F. App'x 0034P

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the superintendent exercised discretion to admit students
explaining that the superintendent exercised discretion to admit students
finding no Fifth, Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment violation where “the deprivations imposed . . . were affirmative steps to secure [the detainee’s] well-being, in furtherance of the jail staff’s legitimate and non-punitive purpose of preventing [his] suicide or injury”
“A mere scintilla of evidence is insufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the nonmovant.”
“Entry of summary judgment is appropriate against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish an element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.”
“Entry of summary judgment is appropriate against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish an element essential to that party’s case, and on which 3Magistrate Judge Grand allowed some discovery to occur after this date (i.e. the parties’ depositions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Siler, Batchelder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.