Daniels v. Weiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendant doctor “cannot escape liability simply because a second physician had the opportunity to correct the initial negligent acts but failed to do so”
• amendment to pleading did not relate back to date of original complaint since spouse's claim for loss of consortium, although derivative in nature, stated a separate cause of action from claim for medical malpractice
• disagreement with verdict not enough to warrant reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).