Daniels v. Terrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because § 1983 plaintiff was convicted of first-degree assault and armed criminal action, he could not re-litigate the “fact that plaintiff shot at Trooper Terrell and initiated the criminal assault” in the context of his § 1983 excessive force claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).