Skip to main content
· 4/30/2024

Daniels v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]hat the jury had other reasons to disbelieve [the witness] does not render the suppressed evidence of the deal immaterial.”
  • “If a state law issue must be decided in order to decide a federal habeas claim, the state’s construction of its own law is binding on the federal court.”
  • “If a state law issue must be decided in order to 12 decide a federal habeas claim, the state’s construction of its own law is binding on the federal 13 court.”
  • “If a state law issue must be decided in order to decide 23 a federal habeas claim, the state’s construction of its own law is binding on the federal 24 court”
  • “If a state law issue must be decided in order 8 to decide a federal habeas claim, the state’s construction of its own law is binding on the federal 9 court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.