Missouri Court of Appeals· 9/5/2000
Daniels v. State
Citations
- 31 S.W.3d 121
- 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1328
- 2000 WL 1236189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that timely mailing does not equate to timely filing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holliger, Lowenstein, Ulrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Daniels v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-01-15· cited 11×
- Unnerstall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-08-21· cited 8×
- Matchett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-09-23· cited 7×
- Morley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-11-27· cited 2×
- KENNETH STEWART v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals· 2022-03-08
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1989-05-16· cited 537×
- Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1991-04-09· cited 243×
- Jason Aaron Ivy v. Paul CaspariEighth Circuit· 1999-04-19· cited 64×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-11-25· cited 57×
- O'ROURKE v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-01-16· cited 18×
- State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-10-01· cited 17×
- Vollmer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-06-20· cited 7×
- Seward v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-12-14· cited 5×
- State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-24· cited 3×
- Ivy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-04-24· cited 2×
- Garrison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-01-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.