Court of Appeals of Alaska· 12/12/2014
Daniels v. State
Citations
- 339 P.3d 1027
- 2014 Alas. App. LEXIS 183
- 2014 WL 6994696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging the overlap between the two non-statutory mitigating factors of extraordinary potential for rehabilitation and exemplary post-offense conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mannheimer, Allard, Hanley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-12-07· cited 600×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-12-27· cited 53×
- Kirby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-12-31· cited 26×
- Lloyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-11-18· cited 25×
- Beltz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-05-28· cited 18×
- Bossie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-08-21· cited 12×
- Silvera v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2010-12-17· cited 9×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2011-07-01· cited 7×
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-01-05· cited 6×
- Harapat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-12-28· cited 4×
- State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-10-31· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.