Daniels v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding waiver on failure to object to the lack of inclusion for assessment of a fine before the Court's decision in Almanza, but explaining it was advantageous not to have objected to charge
• finding waiver on failure to object to the lack of inclusion for assessment of a fine before the Court's decision in Almanza, but explaining it was advantageous not to have objected to charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bogany v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-11-23· cited 70×
• Jewell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-06· cited 15×
• Bogany v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1983-02-17· cited 11×
• Coleman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-06· cited 7×
• Kucha v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-31· cited 2×
• Cain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-04· cited 2×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-23· cited 1×
• Nickolas Dean Josiah Bera v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2011-10-19

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Campbell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-07-16· cited 21×
• Rummel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-05-22· cited 18×
• Buford v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 11×