Skip to main content

Daniels v. State

Citations

  • 329 A.2d 712
  • 24 Md. App. 1
  • 1974 Md. App. LEXIS 259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We may not usurp the function of the jury by holding that the eyewitnesses should be believed over the alibi evidence.”
  • \We may not usurp the function of the jury by holding that the eyewitnesses should be believed over the alibi evidence.\
  • ‘We may not usurp the function of the jury by holding that the eyewitnesses should be believed over the alibi evidence.’
  • `We may not usurp the function of the jury by holding that the eyewitnesses should be believed over the alibi evidence.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orth, C.J., and Moylan and Lowe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.