Daniels v. Runyons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disputes over contract interpretation and performance do not state claim under section 75.1-1
• “[A] defendant’s conduct in exercising perceived rights and remedies under a contractual agreement with another party, even if allegedly contrary to the to the terms of the agreement, does not form the basis for a UDTPA claim.”
• “[A] defendant’s conduct in exercising perceived rights . . . under a contractual agreement with another party, even if allegedly contrary to the . . . terms of the agreement, does not form the basis for a [section 75-1.1] claim.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).