Skip to main content
· 12/31/1987

Daniels v. National Home Life Assurance Co.

Citations

  • 747 P.2d 897
  • 103 Nev. 674
  • 1987 Nev. LEXIS 1894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Nevada public policy outweighed the interest of another state, where the application of the other state’s law would have completely precluded the insured’s widow from recovery
  • “If the statute under consideration is clear on its face, we cannot go beyond it in determining legislative intent.”
  • effectively adopting, although not citing, Restatement (Second
  • effectively adopting, although not citing, Restatement (Second

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steffen, Young, Springer, Mowbray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.