· 12/31/1987
Daniels v. National Home Life Assurance Co.
Citations
- 747 P.2d 897
- 103 Nev. 674
- 1987 Nev. LEXIS 1894
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Nevada public policy outweighed the interest of another state, where the application of the other state’s law would have completely precluded the insured’s widow from recovery
- “If the statute under consideration is clear on its face, we cannot go beyond it in determining legislative intent.”
- effectively adopting, although not citing, Restatement (Second
- effectively adopting, although not citing, Restatement (Second
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steffen, Young, Springer, Mowbray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.