Daniels v. Division of Retirement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing statutory presumption, but reversing because \the Division substituted findings of fact for contrary findings of the hearing officer on subjects on which the hearing officer's recommended order was entitled to greater deference\
• addressing statutory presumption, but reversing because “the Division substituted findings of fact for contrary findings of the hearing officer on subjects on which the hearing officer’s recommended order was entitled to greater deference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).