Skip to main content
· 10/13/1958

Daniels v. Culver

Citations

  • 358 U.S. 843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where plaintiff was not physically abused or incarcerated, and conduct was not “brutal,” baseless charges did not rise to the magnitude of substantive due process violation
  • “Under federal notice pleading, appellants are allowed to vary their the- ory to conform to proof presented.”
  • to be federally cognizable, claimed conspiracy to prosecute on questionable charges requires demonstration that plaintiff was deprived of liberty “unconstitutionally ... or by the distortion and corruption of the processes of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.