· 5/3/1993
Daniels v. City of Goose Creek
Citations
- 431 S.E.2d 256
- 314 S.C. 494
- 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 75
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that any modification of supreme court case law must be undertaken by the supreme court
- where reversal on an issue would not change the result, the issue is moot, and the Court of Appeals need not reach it
- where reversal on an issue would not change the result, the issue is moot, and the Court of Appeals need not address it
- where reversal on an issue would not change the result, the issue is moot, and the Court of Appeals need not address it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.