Skip to main content
· 5/3/1993

Daniels v. City of Goose Creek

Citations

  • 431 S.E.2d 256
  • 314 S.C. 494
  • 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any modification of supreme court case law must be undertaken by the supreme court
  • where reversal on an issue would not change the result, the issue is moot, and the Court of Appeals need not reach it
  • where reversal on an issue would not change the result, the issue is moot, and the Court of Appeals need not address it
  • where reversal on an issue would not change the result, the issue is moot, and the Court of Appeals need not address it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.