Skip to main content
· 4/9/2001

Daniels v. City of Arlington

Citations

  • 246 F.3d 500
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6018
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,519
  • 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1487
  • 2001 WL 286006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Alt- hough personal religious conviction . . . obviously is a matter of great concern to many members of the public, in this case it simply is not a matter of ‘public concern’ as that term of art has been used in the constitutional sense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Wiener, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.