Daniels v. Bucyrus-Erie Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing application of the open and obvious rule in the context of a failure to warn claim
• \The warnings proposed by [plaintiffs'] experts would have provided the crane operator with no unknown information.\
• A manufacturer’s warning that is given “to a person in a position such that he may reasonably be expected to act so as to prevent the danger from manifesting itself” may be sufficient to reasonably protect third-party bystanders.
• A manufacturer’s warning that is given “to a person in a position such that he may reasonably be expected to act so as to prevent the danger from manifesting itself” may be sufficient to reasonably protect third-party bystanders.
• A manufacturer’s warning that is given “to a person in a position such that he may reasonably be expected to act so as to prevent the danger from manifesting itself” may be sufficient to reasonably protect third-party bystanders.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).