Daniels v. Bryson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disfavoring an injunction where the acts complained of have already been committed and there is not a well-grounded probability of similar future conduct
• “The impermissible withholding of documents otherwise required to be disclosed constitutes, in and of itself, irreparable injury to the person making the public records request.”
• injunction will not be granted where it appears the acts sought to be enjoined have already been committed and there is no showing that there is a reasonable probability that such acts will continue in the future
• “Since the purpose of Chapter 119 is to afford disclosure of information without delay to any member of the public making a request, nondisclosure prevents access to the information and is an injury not ordinarily compensable in damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).