Daniels v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ALJ’s decision at step three of the disability determination was contrary to agency regulations and rulings and therefore warranted remand
• holding that the ALJ must make a factual finding supported by substantial evidence as to which age category should apply
• burden on Commissioner to consider appropriate Grid provision in borderline age situations
• “The Commissioner must determine based on whatever evi dence is available which of the categories on either side of the borderline best describes the claimant, and the Commissioner may apply that category in using the grids.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).