Daniello v. Gray
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 641
Syllabus
CIVIL - Modifying child support R.C. 3119.79 permits a court to modify child support if there is a substantial change in circumstances not contemplated when the court issued the original child support order child support gross income R.C. 2705.031(B)(1) R.C. 3121.43 collecting child support payments R.C. 3119.23 provides a list of non-exhaustive factors for a court to consider when modifying child support Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(d) requires a court to rule on objections, but it does not state that a magistrate cannot amend its decision.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the decisive question in resolving the statute-of-limitations issue is when the continuing offense terminates”
- noting, for larceny, that \[t]he crime is complete when the act is complete\
- The “core notion” of FARA is that “government officials and the public generally should be able to identify those who act on behalf of a foreign principal.”
- “the statute criminalizes the willful failure to comply with the information production requirements”
- \the statute criminalizes the willful failure to comply with the information production requirements\
- “For example, a larceny is completed as soon as there has been an actual taking of the property of another without consent, with intent permanently to deprive the owner of its use. The offense does not ‘continue’ over time. The crime is complete when the act is complete.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eklund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.