Daniell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that under article 36.16, an additional charge may be given after arguments at the request of the jury
• noting that under article 36.16, additional charge may be given after arguments at the request of the jury
• noting that if instruction could have been given as part of original charge, it may be given as supplemental instruction
• finding that the trial judge’s substantive response to the jury that there were no correctional facilities available in Hill County constituted an improper instruction on a factual matter
• finding that the trial judge's substantive response to the jury that there were no correctional facilities available in Hill County constituted an improper instruction on a factual matter
• “Article 36.14 does not authorize the judge to give instructions with regard to factual matters, but only as to the applicable law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).