Daniela M. Ciorba v. John D. Ashcroft, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the claim that the case was improperly streamlined lacked merit because there was no underlying error in the IJ’s asylum decision
• concluding that the claim that the case was improperly streamlined lacked merit because there was no underlying error in the IJ's asylum decision
• concluding that the claim that the case was improperly streamlined lacked merit because there was no underlying error in the IJ's asylum decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).