Skip to main content
· 6/12/1995

Daniel W. Varel v. Banc One Capital Partners, Inc., Formerly Known as Mventure Corp.

Citations

  • 55 F.3d 1016
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14461
  • 1995 WL 350441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the word \and\ in a contract may mean \or\
  • holding that the word \and\ in a contract may mean \or\
  • discussing how courts applying the Restatement must examine \whether performing the condition precedent was the object of the contract or merely incidental to it\ and then weigh whether the penalty is extreme when \measured against the purpose\ of the condition
  • D'Oench inapplicable where issue is not the enforceability of a secret, unwritten side agreement, but whether to allow parol evidence concerning the intendment of an ambiguous written contract provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Higginbotham, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.