Daniel v. Walder
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3195
Syllabus
Magistrate dismissed plaintiff's action, stating that the matter had already been addressed in a prior case. A week later, the trial court adopted the magistrate's decision and dismissed the action. Eight days later (15 days after the magistrate's decision was filed), both the magistrate's decision and the trial court's judgment were served on the parties. Plaintiff's subsequent objections to the magistrate's decision were untimely and were tantamount to a motion for reconsideration, which is a nullity. The trial court's judgment overruling those objections as untimely was also a nullity. Plaintiff's appeal from the trial court's second judgment overruling the untimely objections is dismissed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.