Skip to main content
· 7/7/2000

Daniel v. Underwood

Citations

  • 102 F. Supp. 2d 680
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9638
  • 2000 WL 963425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the state's \ban on `partial-birth abortion' fails to provide an exception for the preservation of the health of the woman and therefore violates the United States Constitution\ and explaining that Carhart \compels th[is] conclusion\
  • concluding that the state’s \ban on ‘partial-birth abortion’ fails to provide an exception for the preserva- tion of the health of the woman and therefore violates the United States Constitution\ and explaining that Carhart \compels th[is] con- clusion\
  • examining evidence submitted by the parties before concluding that West Virginia's partial birth abortion ban \create[d] a significant health risk\ and therefore had to provide a health exception
  • exam- ining evidence submitted by the parties before concluding that West Virginia’s partial birth abortion ban \create[d] a significant health risk\ and therefore had to provide a health exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.