· 7/7/2000
Daniel v. Underwood
Citations
- 102 F. Supp. 2d 680
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9638
- 2000 WL 963425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the state's \ban on `partial-birth abortion' fails to provide an exception for the preservation of the health of the woman and therefore violates the United States Constitution\ and explaining that Carhart \compels th[is] conclusion\
- concluding that the state’s \ban on ‘partial-birth abortion’ fails to provide an exception for the preserva- tion of the health of the woman and therefore violates the United States Constitution\ and explaining that Carhart \compels th[is] con- clusion\
- examining evidence submitted by the parties before concluding that West Virginia's partial birth abortion ban \create[d] a significant health risk\ and therefore had to provide a health exception
- exam- ining evidence submitted by the parties before concluding that West Virginia’s partial birth abortion ban \create[d] a significant health risk\ and therefore had to provide a health exception
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.