Daniel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because a plea proceeding and a later adjudication of guilt are essentially the same proceeding, it is as if the intervening time between the two proceedings had never passed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29· cited 38×
• State v. Romero
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-09-14· cited 13×
• Griffith, Darrell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-04-29· cited 5×
• Jason Eureste v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-06-07
• Griffith, Darrell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stancliff v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-25· cited 27×
• Turcio v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-04-26· cited 12×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-06-04· cited 11×
• McClendon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-01-11· cited 6×