Skip to main content

Daniel v. State

Citations

  • 577 S.W.2d 231
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that absent evidence that anyone other than the defendant caused the victim’s death, no causation instruction was required
  • holding that absent evidence that anyone other than the defendant caused the victim’s death, no causation instruction was required
  • concluding that when appellant elected jury punishment before trial, it was not error for jury to assess punishment because “[t]here [was] no consent of the attorney for the State to change [appellant’s] election” to court-assessed punishment
  • as used in statute \mistake\ and \accident\ mean \unintentional\
  • no error for the jury rather than judge to assess punishment when the defendant asked the trial court to submit his application for probation to the jury, and “[t]here [was] no consent of the attorney for the State to change his election”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Douglas, Phillips, Davis, Roberts, Odom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.