District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/26/2008
Daniel v. State
Citations
- 991 So. 2d 421
- 2008 WL 4361234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[A] trial court that has jurisdiction over criminal proceedings has priority jurisdiction over other courts to determine whether property seized for use in criminal proceedings is to be retained or returned to the owner.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monaco
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Garmire v. Red LakeSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-06-14· cited 27×
- Sawyer v. GableDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-16· cited 26×
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-19· cited 16×
- Eight Hundred, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-12· cited 16×
- Kern v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-30· cited 12×
- Helmy v. SwigertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-03· cited 12×
- Stevens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-09· cited 12×
- Oleandi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-06· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.