Daniel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a hearing on a motion to withdraw plea is a critical stage of the proceedings
• reversing denial of rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea that alleged counsel misadvised him regarding sentencing, and remanding for evidentiary hearing because record failed to show that defendant was not entitled to relief
• “[A] motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(Z) is a ‘critical stage’ in which the defendant is entitled to effective assistance of counsel ....” (quoting Brown v. State, 835 So.2d 402, 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mourra v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-08· cited 34×
• Iaconetti v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-02· cited 19×
• KRAUTHEIM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-11· cited 10×
• Molina v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-08· cited 4×
• Pagan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-14· cited 3×
• Curran F. Lane v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-04
• Bettis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-03
• Cooper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Leroux
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 196×
• Snodgrass v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-22· cited 30×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-31· cited 9×
• Garcia v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-18· cited 1×