Skip to main content

Daniel v. State

Citations

  • 486 S.W.2d 944
  • 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in reviewing jury charge for alleged error, in this case complaint that charge as worded was confusing, “[t]he charge should be viewed as a whole, and review should not be limited to parts of the charge standing alone”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.