Skip to main content
· 7/21/2005

Daniel v. Spectrum Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 381 F. Supp. 2d 1368
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14925
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,047
  • 2005 WL 1711871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Standing alone, a single, isolated schedule change certainly would not constitute a tangible employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Land

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.