Daniel v. Snowdoun Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a presumption of consideration may be rebutted by “proof designed to show that the consideration was not actually paid or bargained for” and that “any conflict in the testimony is for the trier of fact”
• “It is generally held that for consideration to be valid, it must have been bargained for . . . .”
• forbearance to sue can constitute consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).