Skip to main content
· 7/31/2015

Daniel v. Johns Hopkins University

Citations

  • 118 F. Supp. 3d 312
  • 2015 WL 4611525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that being struck repeatedly by a co-worker was neither sufficient nor pervasive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Royce C. Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.