Daniel v. Holtclaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining court may apply “12(b)(1) standard to certain issues in a motion for judgment on the pleadings while applying a 12(b)(6) standard to other issues”
• stating a trial court’s jurisdiction is “its very power to hear the case”
• “Courts have routinely held that property interests and rights do not rise to the level of fundamental rights requiring a strict scrutiny analysis.”
• “The term ‘supplemental jurisdiction’ is now used to refer collectively to the common-law doctrines of ancillary jurisdiction, pendent jurisdiction, and pendent-party jurisdiction.” (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1367) (collecting cases)
• “A district court cannot enter a judgment purporting to bind nonparties over whom it does not have jurisdiction.” (alterations omitted) (citing Steans v. Combined Ins. Co. of Am., 148 F.3d 1266, 1271 (11th Cir. 1998)
• “The Declaration of Independence is a statement of ideals, not law’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).