Skip to main content
· 6/4/1963

Daniel v. Hazel

Citations

  • 131 S.E.2d 260
  • 242 S.C. 443
  • 1963 S.C. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury verdict for plaintiff generally negates any inference of prejudice although instructions were in error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bussey, Taylor, Moss, Lewis, Brailsford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.