Daniel v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that tort claims may have different elements and must be analyzed separately to determine when each claim has accrued
• “Plaintiff’s malicious prosecution claim, unlike her other claims, could not accrue until the prosecution terminated in her favor.”
• “Various causes of action in tort arising from the same set of facts may commence running at different times depending on the nature of the several causes of action involved, and the fact that the statute has run as to one does not necessarily mean that the statute has run as to all.”
• “Various causes of action in tort arising from the same set of facts may commence running at different times depending on the nature of the several causes of 26 action involved, and the fact that the statute has run as to one does not necessarily mean that the statute has run as to all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).