Daniel v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s interpretation of retirement statute and holding “Under [plaintiff’s] analysis, Section 12(d) renders Section 17 wholly superfluous. This cannot have been the legislature’s intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).