Supreme Court of Florida· 6/19/1997
Daniel v. Daniel
Citations
- 695 So. 2d 1253
- 1997 WL 333900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that, where child was born during an intact marriage, her status as a “legitimate” child would not be affected by any paternity determination
- noting “the parties stipulated that Michael Daniel was not the biological father of the child”
- limiting Privette to “those instances where a child faces the threat of being declared illegitimate, and the ‘legal father’ also faces the threat of losing parental rights which he seeks to maintain”
- declining to apply the Privette test in a dissolution of marriage action where the husband raised the issue of paternity, the parties stipulated that the child was not biologically related to the husband, and the husband had never committed to supporting the child
- recognizing Daniel’s limitation of Privette
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lander v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-15· cited 18×
- Lefler v. LeflerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-03· cited 14×
- Achumba v. NeusteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-06· cited 13×
- Treneka Simmonds v. Connor PerkinsSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-06-28· cited 12×
- DEPT. OF REV. EX REL. PRESTON v. CummingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-12· cited 10×
- DF v. Department of Revenue Ex Rel. LFSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-06-06· cited 8×
- Fernandez v. McKenneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 8×
- DF v. Department of Revenue Ex Rel. LFDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-09· cited 8×
- L.J. v. A.S.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-03· cited 8×
- C.C.A. v. J.M.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-06· cited 8×
- Florida Dept. of Revenue v. MLSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-18· cited 7×
- Callahan v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-30· cited 7×
- Parker v. ParkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-30· cited 6×
- Hebner v. BarryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-02· cited 6×
- DeRico v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-24· cited 5×
- Gantt v. GanttDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-02· cited 5×
- Lefler v. LeflerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-30· cited 5×
- Contino v. Estate of ContinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-12· cited 3×
- JENNIFER DAVIS v. COURTNEY DAVISDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-16· cited 3×
- R.H.B. v. J.B.W.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-03· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES v. PrivetteSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-04-08· cited 105×
- Taylor v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-06-22· cited 28×
- Albert v. AlbertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-18· cited 27×
- Portuondo v. PortuondoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-26· cited 16×
- O'Bryan v. DoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-20· cited 15×
- Bostwick v. BostwickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-01· cited 12×
- Swain v. SwainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 10×
- Daniel v. DanielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.