Skip to main content
· 11/23/1981

Daniel v. Cupp

Citations

  • 54 Or. App. 824
  • 636 P.2d 452
  • 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • money used to buy drugs was considered derivative contraband because the money was used for an unlawful purpose
  • money used to buy drugs was considered derivative contraband because the money was used for an unlawful purpose
  • trial court, as the trier of fact in a forfeiture case, determines the credibility of the witnesses and draws reasonable inferences and reaches conclusions to which the evidence lends itself
  • trial court, as the trier of fact in a forfeiture case, determines the credibility of the witnesses and draws reasonable inferences and reaches conclusions to which the evidence lends itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoomissen, Richardson, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.