Skip to main content
· 7/27/2007

Daniel v. Conway

Citations

  • 498 F. Supp. 2d 673
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55096
  • 2007 WL 2193999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An erroneous evidentiary ruling may qualify for habeas relief only if such error violated petitioner’s due process rights to such an extent as to deprive him of a fundamentally fair trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.