· 3/16/2009
Daniel v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Citations
- 650 F. Supp. 2d 1275
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77799
- 2009 WL 2611270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the “[p]laintiff’s statement that the entire balance was in dispute, without identifying the specific transactions that caused the balance to be incorrect, was not a sufficient notice of billing error”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jack Camp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.