Skip to main content
· 3/16/2009

Daniel v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.

Citations

  • 650 F. Supp. 2d 1275
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77799
  • 2009 WL 2611270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “[p]laintiff’s statement that the entire balance was in dispute, without identifying the specific transactions that caused the balance to be incorrect, was not a sufficient notice of billing error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jack Camp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.