Skip to main content

Daniel v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 368 So. 2d 810
  • 6 A.L.R. 4th 349
  • 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • which, however, recognized assumption of the risk, not contributory negligence, as the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bolin, Price and Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.