· 8/26/1980
Daniel v. Ansul Co.
Citations
- 547 F. Supp. 5
- 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17085
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument made in the “statement of facts” in the brief, even though the appellant had “not devoted a specific section of his brief” to that argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kazen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.