Daniel Sullivan v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorneys were not ineffective because defendants generally “cannot make out a prima facie case for discrimination by merely pointing out the race of the stricken juror, but that essentially is all he has done here”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Little
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-06-08· cited 5×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller-El v. Cockrell
  Supreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Purkett v. Elem
  Supreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
• Miller-El v. Dretke
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
• United States v. Michael L. Johnson
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-08-15· cited 123×
• United States v. Wayne Stephens
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-08-29· cited 98×
• United States v. McMath
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-03-19· cited 96×
• United States v. Demettris Cruse
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-11-03· cited 77×
• United States v. Bolden
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-11-04· cited 54×
• United States v. Jesus Alvarez-Ulloa
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-04-21· cited 37×
• Gilbert Spiller v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-04-28· cited 34×
• Anderson v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-08-02· cited 17×
• United States v. Montarico Johnson
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-06-24· cited 9×
• United States v. John Sullivan
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-08-28· cited 7×
• Mitchell v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-01-25· cited 5×